Comments on: Firefox Sucks : And a look at Tamarin

By: China Supplier Fiancing

China Supplier Fiancing — Wed, 10 Mar 2010 05:44:39 +0000

I use firefox ,but i think it is not very suit to web2.0.

By: custom transformers

custom transformers — Tue, 09 Mar 2010 18:22:47 +0000

Great blog post. It’s useful information.

By: Albert M. Kramer

Albert M. Kramer — Thu, 04 Mar 2010 11:42:00 +0000

I agree with that firefox sucks, as a matter of fact all mozilla products behave pretty sh**ty don’t know why but I am tired.
I am glad that chrome has a possibility of installing some plugins.

By: Bob

Bob — Wed, 03 Mar 2010 07:47:57 +0000

I am using firefox 3.5 now, much improved. Speed is generally faster but mine seems to take a while for a cold boot.

By: โปรแกรมร้านอาหาร

โปรแกรมร้านอาหาร — Tue, 02 Feb 2010 15:38:00 +0000

Look at it. Firefox is good.

By: Problem Solver

Problem Solver — Fri, 22 Jan 2010 08:14:18 +0000

The king of crash…

By: ศูนย์คอมพิวเตอร์

ศูนย์คอมพิวเตอร์ — Mon, 18 Jan 2010 13:58:00 +0000

I always use safari.

By: network

network — Mon, 18 Jan 2010 07:12:49 +0000

really. version 3.5 is also good for me.

By: pattaya realestate

pattaya realestate — Sun, 17 Jan 2010 13:38:55 +0000

anyway i still use the same version 3.xxx

By: links london charms

links london charms — Thu, 17 Dec 2009 08:47:22 +0000

then use firefox -ProfileManager, to manage your firefox session.
1 window session for email, and other javascript friendly website
1 window session for development
optional window for other purpose

By: Zloe

Zloe — Fri, 09 Oct 2009 17:02:35 +0000

I like most firefox.

By: hnggpp

hnggpp — Thu, 08 Oct 2009 10:22:41 +0000

I not like firefox 3.0

By: Talk about online business & marketing

Talk about online business & marketing — Sat, 12 Sep 2009 14:41:16 +0000

who can resolve this problem ?

By: Juergen

Juergen — Mon, 18 May 2009 21:58:08 +0000

I’m using Firefox 3 (3.0.10) and it is OK for me (now). I agree that first time I kept one installation with FF2. Mainly I needed time for the URL completion feature which takes beside URL as well the title of the website into account.

But no I feel comfortable with it.

By: Win7

Win7 — Tue, 05 May 2009 04:53:09 +0000

I used FF from version 2.5,now I am using 3.0.I like it,at least it’s better than IE,that’s my 2 cents

By: login

Your site is a refreshing change from the majority of sites I have visited. When I first started visiting web sites I was excited by the potential of the internet as a resource and was very disappointed initially. You have restored my enthusiasm and I thank you for your efforts to share your insights and help the world become a better place.

By: sufehmi

sufehmi — Fri, 20 Feb 2009 04:50:54 +0000

@Mozilla – Yes, but not so bad anymore.
.
I thank Google Chrome for it — not too long after it’s released, Mozilla released new version of Firefox with much better Javascript performance. Hurray for Google.

By: sufehmi

sufehmi — Fri, 20 Feb 2009 04:49:47 +0000

@Vanity – Yes I’ve tried others :
.
Chrome : not so stable, dunno why. And it still crashes.
.
Safari : sucks big time – when it crashed, you lost all of your open tabs. At least Firefox is able to remember what you were browsing.
.
Opera : okay, but after a while will slows down too.

By: Mozilla Firefox Download

Mozilla Firefox Download — Thu, 19 Feb 2009 22:53:23 +0000

Out of curiosity, are you still seeing these issues with the latest release of Firefox 3? I have found Firefox 3 to be very fast so far but do prefer to disable some of the new features such as the Smart Location Bar.

By: Bathroom Vanity

Bathroom Vanity — Fri, 23 Jan 2009 21:11:51 +0000

Since you identified the problem with Firefox, but there doesn’t seem to be a solution (for the time being, anyway), have you considered looking into other non-IE browsers? (I’m asking, not suggesting… I really don’t know if they’re any better.) Is Safari or Google’s Chrome any better performance-wise with these kinds of sites?